What is the Socio-Historical Method
in the Study of Religion?


Darren M. Slade

Slade is the Executive Director of the Global Center for Religious Research (GCRR.org) and is adjunct professor of humanities at the Rocky Mountain College of Art and Design. He is a theological historian, systematician, and critical rationalist philosopher, who specializes in historic-speculative theology, theoretical metaphysics, and the socio-political development of religious belief systems. His other research and publications can be viewed on his personal website: darrenmslade.academia.edu.


Internet Archive

*Data sourced from Dimensions, an inter-linked research information system provided by Digital Science.

Article Information:

Author: Darren M. Slade

Title: "What is the Socio-Historical Method in the Study of Religion?"

Journal: Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry

Journal Issue: Volume 2, Number 1

Date: Spring 2020

Pages: 1-15

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33929/sherm.2020.vol2.no1.01

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to answer what the socio-historical method is when applied to the study of religion, as well as detail how numerous disciplines (e.g. archaeology, anthropology, sociology, psychology, philosophy, theology, musicology, dramatology, etc.) contribute to its overall employment. In the broadest (and briefest) definition possible, a socio-historical study of religion coalesces the aims, philosophies, and methodologies of historiography with those of the social and cultural sciences, meaning it analyzes the interpretation and practice of religion through the lens of social/historical contexts, scientific discovery, and from within each faith tradition. The result is that the contexts surrounding a particular religion becomes the primary subject of study in order to better understand the origin, development, and expression of the religion itself. This article explains that the socio-historical study of religion is, in essence, an eclectic methodology that focuses on describing and analyzing the contexts from which the interpretation and practice of religion occurs. The goal is to examine how different aspects of a religion function in the broader socio-political and cultural milieu. Its most fundamental postulation is that the social history of a religious community affects how it interprets and practices their faith. By approaching religious inquiry from a socio-historical perspective, researchers are better able to recognize religion as a cultural and institutional element in ongoing social and historical interaction. Three sections will help to explain the socio-historical method: 1) a definitional dissection of the term “socio-historical”; 2) an elaboration of the principles inherent to the methodology; and 3) a case study example of the socio-historical method in practice.


 

Keywords: Socio-Historical Method, Social-Scientific Study of Religion, Religious History, Biblical Criticism, Higher Criticism, Social History, Humanities

Share This Article
  • 4
    Shares
More From the Author:

If you see a problem with this webpage, find some of the links are not working, or are unable to properly view the article, please contact SHERM immediately.


Citation Examples:

Turabian/Chicago:

(footnote) Darren M. Slade, “What is the Socio-Historical Method in the Study of Religion?,” Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry 2, no. 1 (Spring 2020): 1‒15, https://doi.org/10.33929/sherm.2020.vol2.no1.01.

(bibliography) Slade, Darren M. “What is the Socio-Historical Method in the Study of Religion?” Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry 2, no. 1 (Spring 2020): 1‒15. https://doi.org/10.33929/sherm.2020.vol2.no1.01.

MLA:

Slade, Darren M. “What is the Socio-Historical Method in the Study of Religion?” Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry, vol. 2, no. 1, Spring 2020, doi.org/10.33929/sherm.2020.vol2.no1.01, pp. 1‒15.

APA:

Slade, D. M. (2020). What is the Socio-Historical Method in the Study of Religion? Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry, 2(1), 1‒15. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.33929/sherm.2020.vol2.no1.01.

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 2.0 License. Information on obtaining permissions beyond the scope of this license is available at SHERM Journal Permissions.

References:

Allison, Dale C. Jesus of Nazareth: Millenarian Prophet. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress, 1998.

Baker, Coleman, and Amy Balogh. “Social-Scientific Criticism.” In Social and Historical Approaches to the Bible, edited by Douglas Mangum and Amy Balogh. Vol. 3. Lexham Methods Series, 195‒218. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2016.

Blasi, Anthony J., Paul-André Turcotte, and Jean Duhaime, eds. Handbook of Early Christianity: Social Science Approaches. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, 2002.

Carey, Greg. Ultimate Things: An Introduction to Jewish and Christian Apocalyptic Literature. St. Louis, MO: Chalice Press, 2005.

Cavin, Robert Greg, and Carlos A. Colombetti. “The Implausibility and Low Explanatory Power of the Resurrection Hypothesis—With a Rejoinder to Stephen T. Davis.” Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry 2, no. 1 (Spring 2020): 37‒94. https://doi.org/10.33929/sherm.2020.vol2.no1.04.

Cohen, Shaye J. D. From the Maccabees to the Mishnah. 3rd ed. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2014.

Collins, Adela Yarbro. “The Origin of the Designation of Jesus as ‘Son of Man.’” Harvard Theological Review 80, no. 4 (1987): 391‒407.

Collins, John J. The Apocalyptic Imagination: An Introduction to Jewish Apocalyptic Literature. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1998.

Ehrman, Bart D. Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet of the New Millennium. 1999. Reprint, New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.

Ehrman, Bart D. The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.

Eller, Jack David. Social Science and Historical Perspectives: Society, Science, and Ways of Knowing. New York: Routledge, 2017.

Enns, Peter. “Fuller Meaning, Single Goal: A Christotelic Approach to the New Testament Use of the Old in Its First-Century Interpretive Environment.” In Three Views on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament, edited by Kenneth Berding and Jonathan Lunde. Counterpoints: Bible and Theology, 165‒217. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2008.

Esler, Philip F. “Social-Scientific Approaches.” In Dictionary of Biblical Criticism and Interpretation, edited by Stanley E. Porter, 337‒40. New York: Routledge, 2007.

Geertz, Clifford. “Religion as a Cultural System.” In Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion. 1966, edited by Michael Banton. Reprint, 1‒46. New York: Routledge, 2004.

Grabbe, Lester L. Priests, Prophets, Diviners, Sages: A Socio-Historical Study of Religious Specialists in Ancient Israel. Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press International, 1995.

Harding, Susan. The Book of Jerry Falwell: Fundamentalist Language and Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.

Holman, Charles L. Till Jesus Comes: Origins of Christian Apocalyptic Expectation. Hendrickson Publishers: Peabody, MA, 1996.

Horsley, Richard A. Jesus and the Spiral of Violence: Popular Jewish Resistance in Roman Palestine. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row, 1987.

Käsemann, Ernst. “The Beginnings of Christian Theology.” Journal for Theology and the Church 6 (1969): 17‒46.

Lee, Margaret E., ed. Sound Matters: New Testament Studies in Sound Mapping. Vol. 16. Biblical Performance Criticism. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2018.

MacDonald, Margaret Y. The Pauline Churches: A Socio-Historical Study of Institutionalization in the Pauline and Deutero-Pauline Writings. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 60. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Mangum, Douglas, and Amy Balogh, eds. Social and Historical Approaches to the Bible. Vol. 3. Lexham Methods Series. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2016.

Mangum, Douglas, and Douglas Estes, eds. Literary Approaches to the Bible. Vol. 4. Lexham Methods Series. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2016.

Murphy, Frederick J. Apocalypticism in the Bible and Its World: A Comprehensive Introduction. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2012.

“The Nation’s Best Bible College Gets Low Grades on Racial Diversity.” The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education 31 (Spring 2001): 43‒45.

Rhoads, David M. “Performance Criticism: An Emerging Methodology in Second Testament Studies.” Biblical Theology Bulletin 36, no. 3 (Fall 2006): 118‒33.

Richter, Philip J. “Recent Sociological Approaches to the Study of the New Testament.” Religion 14, no. 1 (1984): 77‒90.

Runge, Steven E., ed. Discourse Studies and Biblical Interpretation: A Festschrift in Honor of Stephen H. Levinsohn. Lexham Methods Series. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2011.

Smillie, Dirk. Falwell Inc.: Inside a Religious, Political, Educational, and Business Empire. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2008.

Theissen, Gerd. “The Sociological Interpretation of Religious Traditions: Its Methodological Problems as Exemplified in Early Christianity.” In The Social Setting of Pauline Christianity: Essays On Corinth. 1982, edited and translated by John H. Schütz. Reprint, 175‒200. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2004.

Wallace, Mark I. “Introduction.” In Paul Ricoeur, Figuring the Sacred: Religion, Narrative, and Imagination, edited by Mark I. Wallace. Translated by David Pellauer, 1‒32. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1995.

Share This Page