Is Metaphysics a Science?


Thomas J. Burke

Burke is Chair of the Department of Philosophy and Religion at Hillsdale College and holds the William and Berniece Grewcock Chair in the Humanities. He formally pastored College Baptist Church in Hillsdale from 1974 to 1982 and has been a part-time pastor of the Hudson First Congregational Church in Hudson, MI since 1995. Burke is a graduate of Baylor University (BA), Trinity Evangelical Divinity School (MDiv), Northwestern University-Garrett Theological Seminary (PhD) and Michigan State University (MA, PhD).


 

Internet Archive

*Data sourced from Dimensions, an inter-linked research information system provided by Digital Science.

Article Information:

Author: Thomas J. Burke

Title: "Is Metaphysics a Science?"

Journal: Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry

Journal Issue: Volume 1, Number 2

Date: Fall 2019

Pages: 252-273

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33929/sherm.2019.vol1.no2.08

Abstract

Once esteemed as the highest form of knowledge, the legitimacy of metaphysics as a rational discipline has been severely challenged since the rise of modern science, particularly since it seemed that while the latter reached overall consensus, the disputes in the former seemed interminable. The question naturally arises whether metaphysics could ever achieve the status of a science. The following article presents the view that metaphysics is not nor could ever become a science in the sense of the modern “hard” sciences today because a) it seeks a different sort of knowledge, which b) cannot be acquired by the methods of modern science; and c) metaphysics serves a different cognitive purpose than the sort of knowledge that science can provide. It is, nevertheless, a rational subject, one in fact that supplies the necessary rational foundation for the positive sciences.


 

Keywords: Science, Metaphysics, Theology, Exegesis, Cultural Comparison

Share This Article
  • 4
    Shares
More From the Author:

If you see a problem with this webpage, find some of the links are not working, or are unable to properly view the article, please contact SHERM immediately.


Citation Examples:

Turabian/Chicago:

(footnote) Thomas J. Burke, “Is Metaphysics a Science?,” Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry 1, no. 2 (Fall 2019): 252-73, https://doi.org/10.33929/sherm.2019.vol1.no2.08.

(bibliography) Burke, Thomas J. “Is Metaphysics a Science?,” Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry 1, no. 2 (Fall 2019): 252-73. https://doi.org/10.33929/sherm.2019.vol1.no2.08.

MLA:

Burke, Thomas J. “Is Metaphysics a Science?” Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry, vol. 1, no. 2, Fall 2019, doi.org/10.33929/sherm.2019.vol1.no2.08, pp. 252-73.

APA:

Burke, T. J. (2019). Is Metaphysics a Science? Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry, 1(2), 252-273. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.33929/sherm.2019.vol1.no2.08.

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 2.0 License. Information on obtaining permissions beyond the scope of this license is available at SHERM Journal Permissions.
Call for Papers Ad Color

References:

Aristotle. “Metaphysics.” In The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. 1984, edited by Jonathan Barnes. Translated by W. D. Ross. Vol. 2. Bollingen Series 71. Reprint, 1552‒728. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wq12z.

Aune, Bruce. Metaphysics: The Elements. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1985.

Ayer, Alfred Jules. Language, Truth and Logic. New York: Dover Publications, 1952.

Bacon, Francis. The Instauratio magna Part II: Novum orangum. Edited by Graham Rees and Lisa Jardine. Translated by Graham Rees. Vol. 11. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.

Burke, Thomas J. “Mind-Body Problem, Scientific or Philosophic? Implications for Apologetics.” Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation 36, no. 1 (1984): 13‒18.

Burtt, Edwin Arthur. The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science: A Historical and Critical Essay. 1924. Reprint, London: Routledge, 2001. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315822754.

Carnap, Rudolf. “The Elimination of Metaphysics through the Logical Analysis of Language.” In Logical Positivism, edited by Alfred Jules Ayer, 60‒81. New York: The Free Press, 1959.

Carnap, Rudolf. Philosophy and Logical Syntax. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co., 1935. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315823010.

De Cruz, Helen. “Where Philosophical Intuitions Come From.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93, no. 2 (2015): 233‒49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2014.967792.

Dennett, Daniel C. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987.

Emmelhainz, Roger. “Is History an Art or a Science? Why?” Quora. June 4, 2015. https://www.quora.com/Is-history-an-art-or-a-science-Why.

Feser, Edward. Aristotle’s Revenge: The Metaphysical Foundations of Physical and Biological Science. Neunkirchen-Seelscheid, Germany: Editiones Scholasticae, 2019.

Feser, Edward. Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. Neunkirchen-Seelscheid, Germany: Editiones Scholasticae, 2014.

Hanson, Norwood Russell. Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry Into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1958.

Harris, James F. and Richard H. Severens, eds. Analyticity. Chicago, IL: Quadrangle Books, 1970.

Hempel, Carl G. “Problems and Changes in the Empiricist Criterion of Meaning.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4 (1950): 41‒63.

Hesse, Mary. “Duhem, Quine and a New Empiricism.” In Can Theories be Refuted?, edited by Sandra G. Harding, 184‒204. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 1976. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0_13.

Knobe, Joshua, and Shaun Nichols. “Experimental Philosophy.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 2017. plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/experimental-philosophy/.

Krauss, Lawrence M. A Universe from Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing. New York: Free Press, 2012.

Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1962. doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001.

Lakatos, Imre, and Alan Musgrave, eds. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Vol. 4, Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1970. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139171434.

Laudan, Larry. “The Demise of the Demarcation Problem.” In Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum, edited by Robert S. Cohen and Larry Laudan, 111‒27. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel Publishing, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7055-7_6.

Lukacs, John. The Future of History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012.

Plantinga, Alvin. God and Other Minds: A Study of the Rational Justification of Belief in God. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1967.

Popper, Karl R. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Harper & Row, 1965.

Popper, Karl R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. 1959. Reprint, New York: Routledge Classics, 2002. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994627.

Quine, Willard Van Orman. From a Logical Point of View: Nine Logico-Philosophical Essays. 1953. 2nd ed. Reprint, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.

Quine, Willard Van Orman. From Stimulus to Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.

Robinson, Howard. “Dualism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 2017. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dualism/.

Smart, J. J. C. “The Mind/Brain Identity Theory.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 2017. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mind-identity/.

Song, Bin. “Comparative Metaphysics and Theology as a Scientific Endeavor: A Ruist (Confucian) Perspective.” Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry 1, no. 2 (Fall 2019): 203‒24. https://doi.org/10.33929/sherm.2019.vol1.no2.05.

Suppe, Frederick. The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1974.

Taylor, A. E. Elements of Metaphysics. 1903. Reprint, London: Methuen & Co., 1961. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429461910.

University of Political Science. “Political Science as a Science?” Accessed August 1, 2019. https://www.politicalscienceview.com/political-science-as-a-science/.

Veatch, Henry Babcock. Two Logics: The Conflict between Classical and Neo-Analytic Philosophy. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1969.

Share This Page