top of page
Screen Shot 2022-03-20 at 12.02.00 PM.png

More on the Relevance of Personhood and Mindedness: The Euthanasia Debate

David Kyle Johnson

Vol. 5, No. 1

Summer 2023

Pages: 30‒42

DOI: 10.33929/sherm.2023.vol5.no1.02

ORCID_logo_with_tagline.svg.png
dimensions_logo_400x80.png

Also Available

Abstract

Social Issues: Euthanasia

Euthanasia, Active Euthanasia, Daniel Callahan, Don Marquis, Intrinsic Value of Life

Rational Faith.png
Rational Faith.png

In my first paper for SHERM, I argued that “fetus personhood” is irrelevant to the abortion debate. In this paper, I will argue that personhood is irrelevant to the euthanasia debate as well. Even though a terminally ill patient is a person, ending their life can still be moral. Because personhood (and mindedness) is only instrumentally valuable as means to attaining the good life, if a terminal illness has now made that impossible, it is permissible (when both the doctor and patient agree) for the doctor to help the patient end their life. Thus, euthanasia should be legal.

Preview

Davis, Stephen vol 2, no 2 PREVIEW_Page_
1.99

1.99

Print Issue

TBD

SHERM Front Cover - no glow.png
crossref-members.png
Proquest Ebsco Logo.png
ORCID_Cert_Service_Provider_logo[&vF].pn
ATLA 3.jpg
Graphic Advertisement 1 (oval).png
bottom of page