Screen Shot 2022-03-20 at 12.02.00 PM.png

Genus Unbelief, Species Atheism: The Case for and Against Unbelief as a Master Concept for Non-Religion

Jack David Eller

Vol. 3, No. 1

Summer 2021

Pages: 1-24

Genus Unbelief, Species Atheism: The Case for and Against Unbelief as a Master Concept for Non-Religion

DOI: 10.33929/sherm.2021.vol3.no1.01

More from the Author

ORCID_logo_with_tagline.svg.png

Abstract

Rational Faith.png
Rational Faith.png

Editorial

Jack David Eller, Atheism, Unbelief, Irreligion, Belief, Credition, Religion, Humanism

Recent initiatives by Stein, Flynn, Conrad, and others have promoted ‘unbelief’ as a replacement, an ‘umbrella term,’ for concepts like atheism, secularism, and irreligion. In this essay I show that unbelief as it is currently construed cannot serve this function: it is simultaneously too broad (embracing not only irreligion but heterodox religious belief) and too narrow (focusing on religious belief to the exclusion of other types of belief), and it commits a taxonomic error of equating unbelief with categories above and below its level. However, I also argue that, once reformed and disciplined, unbelief is a valuable and essential tool, and I provide some resources and models for a future Unbelief Studies in the Credition Research Project and the literature on agnotology, as well as ethnographical material questioning the cross-cultural applicability of belief and unbelief. Finally, I charge Unbelief Studies with the mission not only to analyze belief but to criticize and ultimately banish it as a bad mental and linguistic habit that perpetuates mistakes and leaves individuals vulnerable to further faults while eroding social trust and facticity itself.

Preview

Davis, Stephen vol 2, no 2 PREVIEW_Page_
$1.99

$1.99

dimensions_logo_400x80.png
SHERM Front Cover - no glow.png

Print Issue

$22.50

ATLA 3.jpg
ORCID_Cert_Service_Provider_logo[&vF].pn
crossref-members.png
Screen Shot 2022-03-20 at 12.04.43 PM.png