Comparative Metaphysics and Theology as a Scientific Endeavor: A Ruist (Confucian) Perspective

Bin Song

Vol. 1, No. 2

Fall 2019

Pages: 203-224

Comparative Metaphysics and Theology as a Scientific Endeavor: A Ruist (Confucian) Perspective

DOI: 10.33929/sherm.2019.vol1.no2.05

ORCID_logo_with_tagline.svg.png

Abstract

Also Available

Rational Faith.png
Rational Faith.png

Position Paper

Bin Song, Science, Metaphysics, Ruism, Confucianism, Kant, Luo Qinshun

Understood as being nothing more than fallible assumptions about the boundary conditions of an inquisitive worldview, this article seeks to argue that metaphysics and theology can, in fact, be pursued as a scientific endeavor. If we broaden our understanding of how perceived realities furnish feedback in order to refine preestablished human discourses, Ruist (Confucian) metaphysics and theology especially can be recognized as being historically pursued as a science by its own right. Eventually, the distinction of Western and Ruist traditions of metaphysics and theology, as well as the imperfections in each of them, speaks to the need of mutual learning for constructing a more robust metaphysical worldview in the twenty-first century.

Preview

Davis, Stephen vol 2, no 2 PREVIEW_Page_
$1.99

$1.99

dimensions_logo_400x80.png
SHERM Front Cover - no glow.png

Print Issue

$23.25

ATLA 3.jpg
ORCID_Cert_Service_Provider_logo[&vF].pn
crossref-members.png